At the Munich Security Conference today, Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced a turnaround in dealings with the armaments industry. For the past 20 years, the relationship between the Department of Defense and industry has been treated like buying a car. The government had assumed that there would always be a supply and ongoing production, the Chancellor continued. As a result, a system was ordered and production then came to a standstill. Scholz emphasized that this behavior had to change in order to protect one's own security and explained: "We need permanent production of our most important weapon systems. The same applies to repair and ammunition issues.”
As an example of a first step in this direction, Scholz named Rheinmetall's construction of a production line for the manufacture of 35mm ammunition for the anti-aircraft tank Gepard in Germany. This should ensure a constant supply of ammunition for the cheetahs deployed in Ukraine.
In addition to a national change in attitude towards the armaments industry, above all in the area of strategic armaments policy at the European level there must be a concerted effort. “These are steps towards a Europe of defense and armaments. At the same time, these are steps towards a geopolitically more capable Europe. To a Europe that is also a stronger transatlantic ally. This includes doing more to resolve conflicts in our neighborhood," said Scholz, referring to projects such as the Futur Combat Air System (FCAS), the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) and the European Sky Shield Initiative (ESSI). .
Arms deliveries to Ukraine
The Chancellor also advocated the thesis that the weapons supplied by Germany and its partners would help to shorten the war. Scholz argued that the quicker Putin realized that he was not achieving his imperialist goal, the quicker he would withdraw his armed forces from Ukraine. However, the Federal Chancellor stressed that it was always important to strike a balance between providing the best possible support and avoiding an escalation between the nuclear power Russia and NATO. It applies "caution before quick shot and cohesion before solo performance".
Permanently two percent for defense
According to Scholz, Germany also acknowledges its responsibility for the security of Europe and the NATO alliance area. This will be redeemed with the readiness of a brigade to defend Lithuania, with the support of Poland and Slovakia in air defence, by protecting critical infrastructure in the North Sea and Baltic Sea and by the Bundeswehr leading the NATO spearhead this year and 17,000 soldiers keep soldiers on standby.
“In order to be able to do that and do even more in the future, we are putting an end to the neglect of the Bundeswehr. With the special fund of over 100 billion for the Bundeswehr, we have laid the foundation for this. These funds allow us to permanently change lanes when building up the capabilities of our Bundeswehr. Of course, with new combat aircraft, helicopters, ships and tanks, the costs for ammunition and equipment, for maintenance, training, training and personnel also increase. And so I want to reiterate here the statement I made in the Bundestag three days after the war began: Germany will increase its defense spendingpermanently at two percentof gross domestic product," Scholz continued.
However, the wording of his affirmation of NATO's two percent target has changed when compared to that of the turning point speech of February 27, 2022. There he said: “We will be year after year from now onmore than two percentof gross domestic product in our defense.”
It is unclear whether the formulation made today unintentionally deviated from the original one. However, there are sums of several billion euros between the two formulations, which would flow more or less into the defense budget, which is why an exact, consistent line is not insignificant here.
This new formulation also contrasts with the statements made by Defense Minister Boris Pistorius in Brussels at the beginning of the week. There he demanded that the two percent target should not be seen as a target but as a starting point for measuring the defense budget (ES&T reported).
Editorial staff / oh